You’ll never guess who the ACLU is representing now

In a surprising move, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) announced Saturday that it would be representing the National Rifle Association (NRA) in a landmark case against the New York Department of Financial Services. The case alleges that the regulatory body has overstepped its bounds, using its power to violate the NRA’s First Amendment rights.

The ACLU, known for its staunch defense of civil liberties, made it clear in a series of tweets that while they do not endorse the NRA’s mission or viewpoints on gun rights, they believe in upholding the principles of free speech and the First Amendment.

“We don’t support the NRA’s mission or its viewpoints on gun rights, and we don’t agree with their goals, strategies, or tactics,” the ACLU posted on X, emphasizing their disagreement with the NRA’s stance on gun issues.

The heart of the matter lies in the contention that government officials should not have the authority to penalize organizations based on disapproval of their views. The ACLU contends that regardless of personal opinions on the NRA, the government’s ability to blacklist an advocacy group solely because of its viewpoint sets a dangerous precedent.

“If the Supreme Court doesn’t intervene, it will create a dangerous playbook for state regulatory agencies across the country to blacklist or punish any viewpoint-based organizations — from abortion rights groups to environmental groups or even ACLU affiliates,” warned the ACLU.

The organization acknowledged the gravity of gun violence as a significant threat and recognized the harm caused by America’s approach to firearms in many communities. However, they firmly asserted that opposing the NRA’s viewpoint should not grant government officials the power to silence those with differing opinions.

“The questions at the core of this case are about the First Amendment and the principled defense of civil liberties for all, including those with whom we disagree on the Second Amendment,” the ACLU stated, reiterating its commitment to protecting the rights of organizations to engage in political advocacy without fear of unjust repercussions.